National League Standings, May 19, 1990
METS FANS SHARE THEIR MEMORIES OF THE MAY 19, 1990 GAME:
Dave VW
August 1, 2022
After getting swept by the Giants and losing the first game of their series vs. San Diego, the Mets were in desperate need of a win here. And they had the win well in hand until the final two innings when it almost all fell apart. After giving up a leadoff triple to Bip Roberts, Cone was perfect until an 8th-inning leadoff double by Fred Lynn. A 6-1 lead turned into a 6-4 lead by the time Cone exited, and Franco then tightroped his way to the save. It marked Cone's first win of the season, and he wouldn't get his next one until June 9.
Ralph Kiner called the game along with Mets GM Frank Cashen, which I thought was quite the oddity. I was surprised at Cashen's candor, totally forthcoming to give opinions -- both positive and negative -- in regards to his own players. I could see how his comments could have rubbed the players the wrong way. Speaking of Kiner, he had some golden "Kinerisms" during this game. In particular, he talked about Benito Santiago's name, saying, "Santiago in Spanish means San Francisco. No. Santiago in San Diego means Saint James in Spanish someone once told me, I don't know if that's right or wrong." Pure gold.
Now it's your turn! Tell us what you remember of this game:
Please note:
We're looking for your comments about this specific
game. We've had people use this space to share their thoughts on how the
current season is going, or on ways that the Mets can improve the team.
Such comments, unless in the context of
this particular game,
will be considered off-topic and will be removed.
Example One
The Mets suck! They need to trade Smith and get somebody like
Jones.
This comment is off-topic and will be removed. It has nothing to do with
any specific game. But here's an acceptable alternative:
Example Two
The Mets suck! Smith made three errors in this game, and hit into a
double play, and the Mets blew a 5-0 lead. They need to get rid of Smith
and get somebody like Jones.
See the difference? Here you're getting the same point across, but it's in
the proper context. We wouldn't consider this message to be off-topic, and
we would let it remain.
We do appreciate anybody who takes the time to share their thoughts on our
site, and we hate to remove anybody's postings. But if we didn't take
steps to ensure that only on-topic messages were retained, The Ultimate
Mets Database would become a confusing jumble of unrelated comments,
and would thus be less enjoyable to visitors like you.
Thank you!